The safety and well-being of participants attending a physical training course is paramount and the responsibility for this lies with stakeholders, including the organisation hosting the course, the trainer delivering the course and the participants themselves.
This shared accountability ensures that risks and any issues raised are addressed appropriately.
Who is Responsible for Safety and Well-Being?
1. The Organisation – hosting the training course must ensure the environment is safe, the trainers are competent, and the course content is appropriate. This involves providing suitable facilities, equipment and safety guidelines.
2. The Trainer(s) – holds primary responsibility during the course itself. They are tasked with assessing participants’ capabilities, managing risks and ensuring that the area is clear and free to be conducted safely. The trainer must be vigilant and intervene promptly if they notice any unsafe practices or hazards.
3. The Participants – must disclose relevant health information, adhere to safety instructions and behave responsibly during the training. Their cooperation is vital for maintaining a safe training environment.
The Role of the Medical Declaration Form
The medical declaration form is a critical document which ensures the safety and accountability of all parties involved. It serves the following purposes:
• Risk Assessment: The form allows the trainer to identify potential risks posed by pre-existing medical conditions, injuries, or medications that could impact a participant’s ability to engage safely in physical activities.
• Informed Decision-Making: Trainers can decide whether individuals can take part in the whole training course, they make reasonable adjustments or exclusions are necessary based on the information provided.
• Legal Protection: The form demonstrates that the trainer and organization took reasonable steps to assess and mitigate risks, which is essential in the event of a legal claim.
For example, if a participant discloses a recent shoulder injury, the trainer can adapt exercises to avoid exacerbating the condition or in severe cases, recommend that the participant abstain from certain activities.
Trainer Negligence During a Physical Restraint Course
A trainer could be deemed to be negligent if they fail to uphold their duty of care.
Examples of negligence include:
• Inadequate assessment: Allowing a participant with a known medical condition or injury to engage in activities beyond their capacity.
• Improper technique instruction: Failing to teach techniques correctly can lead to injuries such as sprains or fractures.
• Lack of supervision: Not monitoring participants during exercises, resulting in unsafe practices.
• Ignoring medical declarations: Proceeding with training despite clear indications that a participant is unfit for certain activities.
For instance, if a participant with a heart condition discloses this on their medical form and experiences a cardiac event during high-intensity training, the trainer could be held liable if they failed to act on the disclosure.
Decision-Making Regarding Participation
When a participant declares an injury or medication that may impact their ability to train safely, the final decision should rest with the trainer. This is because:
• The trainer has the expertise to assess the physical demands of the course and match them to the participant’s capabilities.
• The trainer is on-site and can evaluate the participant’s condition dynamically.
However, this decision should be guided by consultation with the participant and if necessary, a medical professional. Trainers must document their decision-making process to ensure transparency and accountability.
Conducting a Post-Course Injury Review
To ensure the safety of participants after the course, a structured post-course injury review should be conducted:
1. Immediate incident reports: Trainers should document any injuries that occurred during the course, including how and when they happened.
2. Participant feedback: Collect feedback to identify any delayed onset injuries or concerns that participants may have noticed post-training.
3. Medical follow-up: Recommend that injured participants seek medical advice and provide support if needed.
4. Review procedures: Evaluate whether any aspects of the training could be modified to prevent future injuries.
5. Trainer accountability: Ensure the trainer reflects on their delivery and implements changes if necessary.
For example, if multiple participants report wrist pain after a restraint exercise, the technique taught should be reviewed for safety and biomechanics.
Who is in Charge During a Course?
If a CEO, Health, a Safety Manager and a HR Manager attend a training course, the trainer is in charge regarding the course’s delivery and participant safety. This is because:
• The trainer is the subject matter expert in the physical techniques being taught.
• The trainer holds the responsibility for maintaining safety and adhering to the course structure.
While the CEO, Health and Safety Manager and HR Manager may hold organisational authority, they must defer to the trainer’s expertise in the context of the training environment.
Conclusion
The safety and well-being of participants in a physical training course rely on the collective responsibility of the organisation, the trainer and the participants.
Clear communication, thorough risk assessment and adherence to safety protocols are essential in mitigating risks.
The trainer, as the on-site expert, plays a pivotal role in ensuring that participants are safeguarded and their responsibilities are underscored by the proper use of medical declaration forms, sound decision-making and comprehensive injury reviews.
Contact me to learn more – https://nfps.info/contact-nfps/