A Supreme Court has ruled that Morrisons supermarket is liable for the actions of a staff member who physically attacked a customer.
This is a wake-up call for all employers because it has broadened the law which holds employers vicariously liable for the acts of their employees who commit a crime whilst at work.
Previously an employer could argue that an employee was acting for entirely personal reasons – lawyers call it being “on a frolic of their own” if they committed a crime, however, this new ruling has broadened that scope.
This ruling now makes it easier for customers of a business who are assaulted by staff – or affected by staff who commit any unlawful act whilst on duty – to hold the employer business liable.
When incidents escalate, staff often act instinctively. A teacher intervenes to stop a fight. A…
Yesterday’s corporate manslaughter appeal decision involving Air France Flight AF447 raises questions far beyond aviation.…
There are moments in frontline practice where an organisation’s policies, training, equipment, leadership and legal…
Because we understand what is at stake. NFPS programmes enable you to: Gain recognised BTEC…
If you are looking for a BTEC Train the Trainer course in the UK, choosing…
The problem is not physical intervention. The problem is what organisations fail to put in…