To find out more about our BTEC Level 3 Restraint Instructor Award Course go to this link:
https://nfps.info/physical-intervention-trainer-course.
Law
Here you will find lots of information relating to English law, legislation and guidance in relation to the lawful use of force for self-defence, the carriage and use of handcuffs, physical restraint and physical intervention.
Seni’s Law [Video]
Seni’s Law is a new law that is being backed by numerous MP’s and other respected individuals. The new law is aimed at reducing the risk of people dying due to restraint on mental health units and if a death occurs for an independent investigation to be carried out, as well as other recommendations.
What is The Difference Between ‘Arresting’ Someone and ‘Detaining’ Someone
Hi, guys. Mark Dawes here. In this short video, I want to answer the question, which is, “What is the difference between arresting someone and detaining someone, and is there a difference?”
The short answer to that is no, there is no difference whatsoever.
The Use of Pain to Restrain Children – A Response From The Department for Education [Video]
Hi Everyone,
Mark Dawes here once again and I’m just doing this video to follow up on a video I did a while ago about the use of force on children and particularly any use of force that may cause discomfort, harm or pain.
Because there’s a drive at the moment by a particular lobbying group to ban or to make illegal should I say any restraining technique with a child that causes pain.
Now I did a video on that and we actually had about three and a half thousand views on Facebook alone, God knows how many on YouTube.
The Use of Pain-Compliance Techniques With Children-Should They Be Made Illegal? [Video]
Hi, guys. Mark Dawes here once again.
It’s a beautiful sunny day so I’m sat in my garden shooting this video so please forgive me the luxury. But I wanted to do this video because I want to get a point out. I want to get an opinion out and I want to clarify something. But first, I want to challenge you and here’s the challenge.
Vicarious Liability – Supreme Court has ruled that Morrisons Supermarket is Liable
A Supreme Court has ruled that Morrisons supermarket is liable for the actions of a staff member who physically attacked a customer. This is a wake-up call for all employers because it has broadened the law which holds employers vicariously liable for the acts of their employees who commit a crime whilst at work. Previously an employer could argue that … Read more
Should We Train Someone in Physical Skills if They are Pregnant [Video]
The question is: Should we train someone in physical skills (restraint, breakaway or self-defence) if they are pregnant?
Employers have certain obligations towards their employees once they have been notified in writing that she is a new or expectant mother.
The Police Do Not Owe Any Common Law Duty of Care to Protect Individuals Against Harm (By Criminals) – And You Can’t Sue Them If They Fail To Attend When You Call Them
The Police Do Not Owe Any Common Law Duty of Care to Protect Individuals Against Harm (By Criminals) – And You Can’t Sue Them If They Fail To Attend When You Call Them [Video]
Does the above statement sound a bit ‘odd’ to you? Especially the first part about the Police not owing a common law duty of care to protect the public against harm?
It may sound at odds with what the police are there to do, primarily protect the public, but the fact of the matter is that the statement is true, as you will find if you read on.
Pain Compliance Techniques With Children Are Not Illegal
Pain Compliance Techniques With Children Are Not Illegal In a recent blog post I mentioned that I had recently met with a Government-appointed panel of ‘experts’ who told me, quite enthusiastically, that it is illegal for anyone to use a physical technique with a child that may intentionally or unintentionally cause pain. You can read that blog post here: https://nfps.info/causing-pain-to-a-child-is-illegal/ Illegal … Read more
Non-Delegable Duty of Care [Video]
A recent ruling from the UK’s highest court, the Supreme Court, has paved the way for the family of a brain-damaged girl to pursue compensation from a local education authority and this ruling has major implications for any organisation that uses sub-contracted agencies or staff.